5.02.2010

Tacky Things I Love

Socks with heels/strappy shoes.

Photobucket
(top left: thecherryblossomgirl; top right, bottom left: modelcouture)


High buns/Topknots.


Double/multiple-finger rings/Knuckle dusters.
Big rings, lots of rings. Rings.

I think I'm a little late catching up with these styles. But that does not stop my ability to enjoy them with my tackiest heart's tackiest desires.

3.21.2010

NPR is trying as hard as it can to give you music for free...



NPR did an awesome thing and made this sampler of music from SXSW that they think is good. Well, not all of it is actually good, but props to them for using their reputation as leverage to make music freer in general. And trust me, the download is worth it.

3.17.2010

F1.AS

Alice Glass presents herself in quite an appreciable way.



I spent an earlier part of today looking into Crystal Castles, the band. I probably listened to their self-titled album every night last semester and was always at least a bit curious as to who put forth the androgynous, highly-affected vocals for the album. You can imagine how pleased I was to discover Alice Glass and all her eccentricities (ran away from home at fourteen and changed her name to Vicky Vale, how improvident). I should've dome some research on this band eight months ago! oh well.

Most of all she impresses me by combining remnants of vintage and punk styles into something more moderate and accessible than either alone. Sometimes she's a bit informal or over the top, but most musicians are, and she's less than most. I love her plain, un-pleated skirts and cardigans. Again: on one hand, she's dressed pencil-like and vintage, and on the other, she's nearing schoolgirl-inspired punk...but her blend sort of transcends either category and keeps me from tastelessly labeling her as either.

I'm also fully ready to admit that our subject does not always look as sharp as she does in these pictures. For this a few reasons poke their heads out of the ground. First and foremost, I probably chose the best images of her on the internet. Why would I not? Second, she's in a band and performs concerts. Of course she looks ratty and tastelessly artsy sometimes; it's more or less her job, or, at least, she has the right to do so since she's an artist and can clearly get away with it. I mean, overall, I pity her for not being able to bridge her keen perception of fashion and her necessarily flawed rawness, but on a comparative basis she looks pretty damn good, hehe.



Hm, I find her eyeliner inoffensive, and I almost can't figure out why. But I can: she uses it to give her eyes a definite shape without drawing too harsh a contrast against her skin - she lets it fade away at the edges instead of insisting upon too sharp an outline. And the jaggedness of her hair and eyebrows complements it well, and she doesn't do it all the time.




I love her stage presence, and would liken her to a comic book character. I don't think she'd be too upset to hear that, either, in light of her aforementioned name change.



The black dress on the right is so perfect for her and for Crystal Castles. In short, I'd call it starry. There's something so modest (it couldn't be plainer) yet nervy about it.

   

Below, pretty. It would be cheesy if it weren't for her hair and makeup. Well, maybe it's still cheesy, but I think she does it well.



There's just something so sprite-like about her! She's the kind of person who's photos might be improved with some JPEG noise and unseemly pixellation. I wish I had that sort of inherent fuzziness. She looks quaintly troublesome. It's already there, without you deciphering it. All pictures are from the Crystal Castles last.fm page, except Crystal Castles's first one, which should be credited to David Waldman / KWC / [formertransformer.com] or something like that, whatever.



3.15.2010

Link Roulette

I recently realized that lots of the things I'd normally toss out as links, others would not properly appreciate. So I shall post at least four random links every so often with a brief description of their overall aesthetic, and you should click one or more at random and investigate them with my thoughts in mind. A lot of the links will direct you to music. Whoops, I love music.

Of late I have been in appreciation of candidness, or of watching people cause things to unfold. Generally more skilled people produce more interesting disclosures, but what a hard thing to quantify! Skilled in what sense? Technical skill can be measured, but a sense of humanity and connectedness often cannot. Often the latter more aptly produces something relatable, or something akin to the way one's brain naturally happens to function. Technicality and practice have counterintuitive baggage that often renders them useless, in the long run. Unfortunate but true. If you learn how to practice candidness or practice how to achieve something natural, please let me know.

one
two
three
four
five
six

You don't have to get it for them to make sense.

2.22.2010

AR3.BH.TD

Beach House – Teen Dream
5.9/10

I heard Beach House for the first time as the opening act to Grizzly Bear. I had never heard of them before and had not even known the name of the opening band to Grizzly Bear before the show. And so I had to form my opinion of them right then and there with nothing to influence me. I felt oddly devoid of pressure in making my choice, as though I had nothing to base my opinion off of – but the music was right there, right in front of my eyes! Is that not all I need?

I concluded that Beach House was decent, yet remained unenthused. I am used to opening bands being bad, and they were definitely pleasant. I remember distinctly hearing “Norway”, the name of the single from this album, and thinking that an integral part of the music was the pace it created. The shimmering pulse of the backing electric guitar makes the music move quite nicely – never overwhelmingly or tiresomely, but diligently. It was fun to watch and almost perfectly played the role intended of an opening act. The guitarist was using his instrument in a creative way and to play a role the guitar does not usually play, and thus I found the band somewhat captivating.

I did not think about Beach House much more until a friend of mine heard my opinion of them; he replied that he loved Beach House and seemed surprised to hear a negative review. I decided to listen again. I went to last.fm to see if there were any free tracks to stream and picked from their most recent album, expecting them to have played off that most. But none of the songs sounded like what I had heard live – they lacked speediness and energy, and seemed limp and tired. They induced boredom because they never seemed to go anywhere.

I later found out they had a new single called “Norway” much nearer in description to what I remembered hearing. When I listened to the first song on Teen Dream, “Zebra”, I could not say I was disappointed. The song soared in a way new to the band. The result is vigorous and crisp. There is a sense of drama that was previously not there. It sounded like an upbeat lullaby.

The next song “Silver Soul” did not impress though. It was more or less a rehash of the first song and seemed less sure of itself. But then “Norway” queued in, and my opinion shifted back upward. The song perplexes me in that I cannot imagine even just what angle of attack must have been necessary to create it. Legrand’s vocals follow a wispy and elusive melody as the guitar dances away unobtrusively, supplementally and chaotically all at once. The song falls out of the chorus to a dull buzz in the background and constantly bending guitar tones that dance around instability and stability, suspense and resolution. And the song hints subtly leading up to the final refrain at 3:30, which exhibits the most musical confidence of the band yet.

Both songs with love in the title were ironically of my least favorite; the band does not sound experienced on the piano, using it in a somewhat amateur way. “Better Time” is tacky rather than pretty with the worst lyric of the album, “how much longer can you play with fire/ before you turn into a liar?” But, songs like “Used to Be” use bright, glossy acoustics to tug around their pace in a convincing and artistic way. “10 Mile Stereo” has fantastic interplay between the drums and guitar. The song pivots at 1:30 as a note sustains and buzzes throughout a chord change and falls into a shoegazey grid of iridescence. It is a beautiful song I find intriguing; I cannot decide if it is happy or sad.

This album veers away from earlier works that lack animation, yet retains Beach House’s stylistic pleasantries. As a whole, though, the band still seems a little bit musically narrow and inexperienced, and will have to display fuller chops before one of their albums will truly hit home.

2.15.2010

AR2.HC.OLS

Hot Chip – One Life Stand
4.6/10

Music’s societal role has shifted drastically since about the late 90s. Music, in itself, is no longer intended for intent, careful listening, but for pumping people up, and essentially, for evoking an aura of "coolness". Music is no longer about nuanced, unique elements that convey some abstract emotional feeling the artist feels he or she can best express through said music, but about honing towards one particular feeling that everyone seems to want – "life is good, I’m cool as hell, everything that’s going on right now embodies my image of cool, and this is how I want to spend my time".

If any band wants to become legitimately popular in this day and age, they have to conform to this requirement in some way or another. Rap does it great, and pop does a decent job too. Indie music specifically makes the people who listen to it feel like they’re better than those two other groups, which is an interesting take on the matter, but which also seems to do its job relatively well. Techno and electronic stuff can be nice and upbeat. But, anything innovative doesn’t work because it will make the listener feel stupid, and anything too personal doesn’t work because it’s lame, and if it inspires empathy in the listener, the listener feels lame. Unfortunately, real listeners want innovative and personal music.

Hot Chip does a half-decent job of reconciling these two issues by trying to mask them with as many satisfying hooks and frills as it can, carefully sliding in bits and pieces of musical prowess where others might not notice, perhaps because they were distracted by something else, perhaps an Alvin-and-The-Chipmunks-like squeal definitive of “We Have Love”? Yeah, kinda like that. Or how about the person gargling helium in the background of “Hand Me Down Your Love”?

But most of the band’s eccentricities do little harm. The slight overuse of synthetic instruments and ambient-slash-techno-bent beats is justified, because those instruments and beats were crisp, well tailored, and penetrating.  The glamorous synthetic strings and autotune in “I Feel Better” are perhaps deemed acceptable because of the richness of the sounds and rhythmic play that develop throughout the song…but maybe not. Their sometimes cheesy catchiness is compensated by layers of subtle melodic variation that interest plenty. The title track is a true sign of this: try to follow the melody and see if you can wait long enough for it to repeat and for you to notice. The depth of the sounds in the beat of this song is also impressive.

The album starts out with the anthem-like “Thieves in The Night” that accurately sets the pace and feel of the album and has some more rich and detailed sounds. “Brother” is one of the worst tracks I’ve heard from Hot Chip. It’s simple and a bit childish, and reeks of a lack of effort. It’s the kind of thing I’ve heard too much of before in a number of places, and it’s wholly disinteresting. The lyrics are rudimentary and not that clever, and the melody feels uninspired. “Slush” is a bit stylistically novel. “Alley Cats” steps up game, though, providing an awkward but pleasant environment for a suspenseful buildup that resolves gradually and warmly. “We Have Love” is a bit too much like Eiffel 65, and “Keep Quiet” sounds like an outtake from Radiohead’s Kid A. “Take It In” clinches with a very pleasant but somewhat standard artsy/indie feel.

Hot Chip moves away from noisier electronic music pretty drastically with this release, instead leaning towards a bit of an odd combination of smooth, glamorous, and tasteless synth-pop, and some pretty phat (as in, they fulfill the aforementioned requirement for successful current music) beats. It’s a bit too layered and textured, poppy in an interrupting way, and lyrically silly to be truly accessible, but is definitely catchy, pulse-heavy, careful, and in some ways, interesting. As all closes, this album took time and effort to create, and so it serves its purpose.

8.12.2009

AR1.TDW.H

The Dead Weather - Horehound
4.1/10

I responded to the following review a while back...

The Dead Weather

Horehound
(Third Man; 2009)

Rating: 45%

With Horehound, the blandest batch of music Jack White has yet been involved in, the audience is finally free to let go and move on with their better memories intact. Ignoring the prominence of singer Allison Mossheart’s chin, voice, and indefatigable cool, White is still obviously the leader of the Dead Weather—more accurately, he’s their muse: the tide pushing them together, the owner of the studio that confirmed their coexistence, the guy that told interviewers their bond had no time for consideration, that it “just was.” More viscerally: that James Bond song sucked, Icky Thump (2007) pretty much sucked, the Raconteurs consistently, satisfyingly suck, so what’s left to expect from White except something else disappointing, something else to bloat the years between Get Behind Me Satan (2005) and now? Surprisingly, Horehound doesn’t necessarily or vehemently suck, it, as if it were meant to, just is.

Which is probably the worst thing to say about a project like the Dead Weather, a collection of stringy people with stringy hair that so desperately want to rub up against your very sensitive conceptions of music as coherently mixed, of simple blues and garage melodies as any fun to listen to, or of constructive self-awareness. The Dead Weather are of course enamored with the Dead Weather—what with how they just are and other mouth diarrhea from Jack White—but I seriously doubt there is any real intention on the musicians’ part to determine if the audience is actually enjoying any of these atonal, borderline nihilistic pop songs. Which, I get, is part of a shtick as old as Jack White’s amps, but never have these musicians—especially White, though Mossheart’s Kills weren’t exactly shying from that coked out stoicism—been so swallowed by image, concept, conceit, whatever as to become, as a band all face, faceless.

The band’s main offense, at least within the close quarters of a pair of headphones, is their implementation of “collaboration”: tagged a “supergroup” or no, Horehound is mixed as flatly as it is loudly, translating supposedly fertile, improvisational Third Man studio time into a melee of half-thoughts and half-assed avant doodads. The album is all, fully, middle ground—vocals scream over one another, White (taking the drums) slaps his cymbals bluntly on top, feedback and lazy echo effects soak every bar; meanwhile, Jack Lawrence (Raconteurs buddy) and Dean Fertita (Queens of the Stone Age touring member; also from Michigan, somehow creating a connection with White where there didn’t seem to be one) alternate squalid riffs on fuzzy bass, fuzzy organ, and an electric guitar only discernible when it’s miming a rudimentary blues solo that apparently is excused because of some pedal-dipping. Forget melody, an absolute kibosh on any sort of dynamics brutalizes what would otherwise thrive in roomsound. It’s hard to enjoy a band that depends solely on mood and atmosphere but can’t let up to realize any.

Even a track as ready-made as “Cut Like a Buffalo,” which could have been sprightly given Fertita’s organ stabs slowly closing in on White’s uncharacteristically restrained hi-hat, can’t help but show off, dippling middle space with boingy nothings and that unrelenting echo, as if imagining dub in a haunted house. Following “So Far From Your Weapon” is the closest Mossheart can get to an engaging vocal performance, fingering some depth in her voice, but that quickly aborts into another cymbal-fat production nightmare. Don’t mind that, um, didgeridoo. “Treat Me Like Your Mother” then succeeds in summing up everything before and everything to follow: a blaring, quacking organ accompanies blaring, quacking Mossheart/White and their atrocious lyrics, then there’s an even squealier solo interrupted uncomfortably by White’s idea that he should enter…now.

There’s also a forgettable Bob Dylan cover and of course there’s bleating, so much bleating: croaks, chirrups, gizzards rupturing seed meal, the lyric “Is that you choking?” followed by actual choking, or a guitar’s facsimile of that (but who fucking cares because it’s still an abysmal stretch of song) snarling and spit and bodily fluids gumming up the record’s blank space like clouds of crows across an otherwise stark and enigmatic moon, what little of the blank space can scoot by unnoticed by every overzealous note this flock of a band skyshits into the inky night.

Horehound, flopping about gracelessly, is as much cygnine as it is whatever adjective applies to that asshole title (Is that some Old English? Like a frosty beagle?) and the Dead Weather, more than “perfectly terrible” as Calum so succinctly put it, is just a stupid animal, small-headed and pear-shaped with a laughable, honking vicious streak. By their very existence they deserve some attention, even some fascination, especially from a fan that refuses to give up on White, but immediately spoil any friendly curiosity by confirming within one minute of “60 Feet Tall” that I may never know how birds have sex but I’m sure it looks gross. Because if this is synergy it’s certainly together—the players seem to be having a good time being badass side by side. “3 Birds,” though it daubles dangerously close to Staind by way of Tortoise, is actually sectioned, one piece earned by the previous, each rich tone savored, examined, and left to play out. Patience, it could be said, will save this band. Or at least a touch of humility; given their affinity for the music of the dispossessed, they seem awful pleased with this shit.

So let’s take a stand—let’s give up, once and for all, on Jack White. For he’s fully invested himself in a brand of music best looked at instead of heard, moreso than any candied radio pop or designer electro, and in that skin-thin margin relegates to the drumkit as if to cut off discussions (see: bitter tirades) like this at the hilt. He denounces Guitar Hero for its, what, keeping kids from playing real instruments and writing real music (?) but hordes a harem of mostly talented poseurs with no real genre or style to imitate besides the vaguest notions of “garage,” “blues,” “goth,” “noise,” “ambient,” or “KoRn.” The sound of the Dead Weather, then, is a filthy liquid nothing made from stubborn, shameless everything, black-brown and heavy with no substance to carry. The Dead Weather makes smegma rock. It’s a squirming, nauseating label no doubt, but so is Horehound, convinced that skuzzed-up guitars and swamp blues roots demand sleaze, humidity, and grime—stylizations without heart, head, or focus, without any kind of sociological anchor, moral fervor, moral corruption, or even genuine rage to humanize the robotic Uber-sex of main players White and Mossheart—and little else. And Allison Mossheart reminds me of Geordi La Forge—but that’s a whole ‘nother thing.
-Dom Sinacola :: 07/31/2009

Image from [http://thebrokengstring.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/new-dead-weather-live-ep/]

This review sounds like it was written by a B-average English major while his girlfriend was bitching for him to eat the microwave dinner she "made" for them. He's got a few interesting ideas floating around in there, but he wasn't smart or focused enough to convey them 100% properly. He's entitled to his opinion and to spew it at us and just because he wrote a bit of a scathing review doesn't mean that he hates Jack or has a vendetta against him (Why would those two things be mutually exclusive? Some of you really need to evolve from the "fish out of water" mindset. I'll give it a few million years.), it just means that he was disappointed with someone (or something in a sense) that he knows can produce better stuff than was produced. Listen to White Blood Cells and tell me Jack has no soul, or that he can't produce an album with supposed "soul" - he is, in fact, capable of producing soul. (Don't think White Blood Cells has soul? I'd rather not prove why I think it does here as my lengthy post would grow exponentially and then even less people would read it.) Finally, his point is relatively worthwhile for me to read and is at the very least not inherently hypocritical. He thinks the album "sounds" like an image. The purpose of everything, including the sounds themselves, is to develop an image. This is particularly evident in the opening and closing of each track. It's as if they had to enter and exit "coolly" in a way that does nothing to aid the song itself. The author is annoyed with this because he was expecting a treat for his ears and got a different kind of treat. The treat was a metaphorical "costume" for Jack to put on. He's Mr. Blues now - adorable.

I kind of agree with him in that sense. I am a bit sick of Jack White focusing on something other than how well the sounds he makes provoke my ears. I kind of see what people are saying now about Get Behind Me Satan (GBMS) being "better" than everything that's come after it - they are upset at the purpose of the later works. GBMS was an attempt Jack made to produce something eclectic for us to listen to. He failed miserably: so badly that I was disheartened for months at a time. But, at least his energy was directed towards the music - that's what the consensus seems to be as to why GBMS has any merit at all, or from what I can grasp. I don't buy into that philosophy because it endorses the "trying is everything" mindset. Trying is not everything; the end result definitely matters. If you listen to The Dead Weather (TDW)'s album and completely ignore Jack's purpose or anything else at all, it sounds kind of nice. The production is purposed and has a distinctive tonality to it - vintage, thick, and yes, sludgy, blues. The cymbals and hi-hat are accentuated because their texture fits the mood of the album properly. You can tell when Jack's on the guitar (or at least, I think I can...If that's not Jack, hats off to the guitarist) - we hear some chops that Icky Thump barely touched upon (it was far too glitzy and pseudorandom), and that GBMS had none of. So Far from Your Weapon and Hang You From The Heavens are somewhat interesting takes on the blues progression - I like the call-and-response of the former. It comes in at an emotionally aware moment of the track. The latter track has some reasonably impressive blues feel on the drums and guitar. The drums are explosive and fill creative parts of the song. Not to mention it has a breakdown...totally sweet. Regardless, the song develops in a booklike fashion and I like it. The vocals are glitzy and reminiscent of the "image" discussed above...I'm not calling it a great album for a reason. "Are Friend Electric?" is done lamely and makes me feel like I'm watching the band fold laundry. "Feet Tall" is cliche as hell itself. "Bone House" has some nice sounds and echoes. "Rocking Horse" could have been a worthwhile inclusion on a CD that was altogether better. "Will There Be Enough Water?" meanders interestingly, but by this point in the album TDW has convinced me to not care. "Broken Bricks" is to "3 Birds" as Crime and Punishment is to a Batman comic. What else is there to say?

The reason we can't take the article's criticism as real musical judgment (in the objective sense) is that he doesn't critique how well it does something...he critiques how well it fits his particular tastes when it comes to music. The Dead Weather creates its image with reasonable capability. The production lends itself to that image and the production is focused and tasteful. The songwriting is perfectly cliche when it needs to be and then all of a sudden becomes "clever" and "breakthrough" at critical moments to trick the listener into thinking it's better than it actually is. That's what an image is - a lens for the music so that you hear it in entirety differently and the band has to do less real work in terms of making a good album. When you listen to that album, you're hearing THE DEAD WEATHER; you're not LISTENING to MUSIC anymore. See? I criticize the idea of creating an image that so heavily mutes the music itself in the first place, which is what TDW has done. It's great that Jack and the rest of the band can create such a pretty and whole lens, but content cannot be compromised. The album was damned from the start. If I want to listen to something like this, I'll listen to The Black Keys. At least Jack is moving towards them, though - that's the band I really turned to when The White Stripes stopped giving me what I wanted - not criticizing, I just didn't WANT Icky Thump or Get Behind Me Satan, whether or not those albums are good or bad.

So, in conclusion, this album doesn't provide the genius of OK Computer or Sung Tongs, but it reinforces the sole fact that Jack and the other band members do have talent in some respect, and like others have said, it wasn't nearly as bland as The Raconteurs.